pointer question

[Archie Lachner]

As I read Kernighan and Ritchie (K & R), the assertion that the statement

	p = p + 4;

where p is a pointer, is dangerous and non-portable is completely wrong.
In section 5.4, p. 98, it is stated that when an int or constant is
added to a pointer, it is first scaled by the size of the object the pointer
points to.  For example, and I am quoting directly now,

	"The construction

		p + n

	means the n-th object beyond the one p currently points to."

As far as I am concerned, K & R contains the definition of the C language.
Expressions such as "p + 4" above are not dangerous and completely portable,
at least to machines and systems where the C compiler implements the language
correctly.
-- 

				Archie Lachner
				Logic Design Systems Division
				Tektronix, Inc.

uucp:    {ucbvax,decvax,pur-ee,cbosg,ihnss}!tektronix!teklds!archiel
CSnet:   archiel at tek
ARPAnet: archiel.tek at rand-relay