286 = 68020?
Dave Trissel
davet at oakhill.UUCP
Wed Jun 5 16:59:20 AEST 1985
In article <1494 at amdcad.UUCP> phil at amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai) writes:
>
> ... What he does say is for programs
>that require less than 64K of data, a 286 competes nicely with a 68020.
>
Perhaps the west coast didn't recieve Dan Tso's Unix benchmarks? It seems
both the 286/310 and IBM PC/AT lost almost all 10 of them against a
10 Megahertz MC68010. [Thats MC68010 - not MC68020.]
>
>>In article <588 at intelca.UUCP> kds at intelca.UUCP (Ken Shoemaker) writes:
>>>maybe Dave realizes that for programs that require less than 64K of data
>>>that a 12MHz 286 actually keeps pace with the 16.67 MHz 68020.
Hummm. Looks like Ken never saw them either. Should they be reposted?
Dave Trissel {seismo,ihnp4}!ut-sally!oakhill!davet
Motorola Semiconductor Inc.
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list