C's Limited Macro Capabilities

[Steve Simmons]

In article <69517 at psuecl.bitnet> bpm at psuecl.bitnet (Brian Moquin) writes:
>This is not legal C, but if it were I think it would enhance the power
>of macro expansions significantly.  Thoughts?

Keep complex macro processing in macro processing languages, leave a
well-defined standard (well....) alone.  See m4.

Shucks, if it were up to me there wouldn't be a cpp at all.
-- 
Steve Simmons	       scs at iti.org         Industrial Technology Institute
	'"You're not a big name on Usenet until someone puts
	  you in their .sig file."		-- Anonymous'