Pound sign (was Re: the Telephone Test)
Mark A Terribile
mat at mole-end.UUCP
Sat May 6 16:31:33 AEST 1989
In article <147 at ixi.UUCP>, clive at ixi.UUCP (Clive) writes:
> ...
> > ...
> >> pound include studio-h (dancers might include studio-54 :->)
> The character that looks like [ # ]
> is a "number" sign or a "hash" sign. It is NOT repeat NOT a pound sign.
> A pound sign is what appears on a five pound note, and looks like:
> --
> /
> ---+---
> ---+---
> /
> -------
> (or some more ornate version). How would you like it if I kept
> saying:
> dollar include stood eye oh dot aitch
Sorry, Clive. I have before me Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary, Eighth
Edition. It is open to the section on ``Signs and Symbols.'' Under the
heading ``Business'' I find
# number if it precedes a number <track #3>; pounds
if it follows <a 5# sack of sugar>
In other words, it's pounds aviordupois, not pounds sterling.
The usage is legitimate, although perhaps we should write
include#
and
if#
The late Ma Bell would have liked us to call it an octothorpe--in fact, I
think in some parts of AT&T they still call it that when it appears on a
Touch-Tone (is that still a registered Service and Trade Mark?) telephone set.
I can tell you that the announcements built into some of their products
instruct the user to ``Press five, followed by the Pound Sign.''
--
(This man's opinions are his own.)
>From mole-end Mark Terribile
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list