Moderated C group ? (was Re: Posting)
Frans van Otten
fransvo at maestro.htsa.aha.nl
Fri May 26 20:08:14 AEST 1989
Karl Heuer writes:
>Frans van Otten writes:
>
>|... If someone has a serious question, he or she can ask it in the
>|moderated group. If the group is known as a high quality one,
>|interest in the unmoderated group will cease.
>
>That sounds reasonable, but it doesn't work that way in practice. If
>you have two groups with essentially the same charter, but only one
>is moderated, the unmoderated one gets all the traffic.
This may be true, I don't know. But anyway: What would be the use of
an unmoderated group next to a moderated group ?
>If there's a problem with too much noise here, the solution should be
>to make comp.lang.c itself moderated.
Yes, I think that's the best solution. I would vote for this. Or is
there any good reason to keep comp.lang.c unmoderated ?
Now, who wants to become eternally famous as The Comp.Lang.C - Moderator ?
--
Frans van Otten | fransvo at maestro.htsa.aha.nl or
Algemene Hogeschool Amsterdam | fransvo at htsa.uucp or
Technische en Maritieme Faculteit | [[...!]backbone!]htsa!fransvo
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list