Problem with ()?():() as ending test in for-loop

[Karl Heuer]

In article <4326 at ficc.uu.net> peter at ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:
>	(()&&(char *))||(~()||(void *))	-- may be char *, will never be void *.

No, it will always be of type int (conceptually boolean, but in C that's int).

Note that the original statement of equivalence was explicitly restricted to
boolean expressions.

Karl W. Z. Heuer (ima!haddock!karl or karl at haddock.isc.com), The Walking Lint