Some optimization results

Dik T. Winter dik at cwi.nl
Wed May 15 10:43:20 AEST 1991


In article <14077:May1321:14:2691 at kramden.acf.nyu.edu> brnstnd at kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes:
 > Hold on. The ``bug'' here is simply that the compiler missed an
 > optimization. Do you mean to imply that any compiler which misses any
 > optimization is buggy?
Yup.  If the compiler tells me he is not doing it because of some reason
that is patently untrue.  (In this case a non-existant dependency.)
--
dik t. winter, cwi, amsterdam, nederland
dik at cwi.nl



More information about the Comp.lang.c mailing list