a thought for speakers
gwyn at smoke.brl.mil
Sat Jun 1 04:36:23 AEST 1991
In article <82848 at bu.edu> tower at buitc.bu.edu (Leonard (Len) H. Tower Jr.) writes:
>It's less then halfway. There are many people, who can ask
>intelligent probing questions without having read your paper, who I
>wish could be given priority instead of those who have spent last
>night dweebing over the paper. For example: Chris Torek, Mike O'Dell,
>Ed Gould, Deborah Scherrer, Evi Nemeth, Keith Bostic, Kirk McKusick,
>Mike Karels, Rick Adams, Barry Shein, Doug Gwyn, Rob Pike, Dennis
>Ritchie, Andrew Hume, Sharon Murrel, Tom Duff, Eric Allman, Dan Geer,
>Rob Kolstad, Doug Gwyn, John Gilmore, and quite a few others.
Gee, I guess I should feel honored to be the only one who gets to
ask TWO questions!
>Simple filters don't work.
>Some would cry unfair, as it would tend to give
>precedence to known wizards.
Wizards tend to communicate with each other anyway, and don't need
to wait for the spotlight at a USENIX Conference.
I think the problem is that (a) asking questions of a speaker is not
a very efficient form of education and (b) too many people use the
opportunity merely to grind their personal axes.
It doesn't seem worth worrying much about.
More information about the Comp.org.usenix