bdf program bug?

[Paul Vixie Esq]

In article <288 at jc3b21.UUCP> larry at jc3b21.UUCP (Lawrence F. Strickland) writes:
>Back in January, Paul Vixie posted a pd df command similar to the Berkely
>df. [...] The 3b2 has a
>SLIGHTLY different output for df -t (or maybe its a difference in fscanf,
>it is a bit hard to tell).  It caused a core dump of the original program.
>After fixing that, the columns no longer lined up properly, so I fixed that.

Several people reported this bug.  I also fixed some things for the 3B15/20,
and someone yet else sent in a fix for RFS systems (df output has "*"'s in it
for RFS file systems...)

I'm presently testing the version with all these fixes applied.  I'll repost
to comp.sources.misc some time after Uniforum... If anyone has any more bugs
to report, please mail them to me so the next version can be "definitive."

If someone wants to write a man page and makefile, I'll post it to .unix...
-- 
Paul A Vixie Esq
paul%vixie at uunet.uu.net
{uunet,ptsfa,hoptoad}!vixie!paul
San Francisco, (415) 647-7023