perl 3.0 patch #28

Tom Neff tneff at bfmny0.BFM.COM
Thu Aug 16 14:54:33 AEST 1990


In article <1990Aug15.230635.2040 at NCoast.ORG> allbery at ncoast.ORG (Brandon S. Allbery KB8JRR/KT) writes:
>As quoted from <15748 at bfmny0.BFM.COM> by tneff at bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff):
>+---------------
>|  * We don't HAVE an unexec() call, and the reference to it in eval.c is
>| not #ifdef'd in any way, nor does Configure check for it.  So the make
>| proceeds to bomb in 'ld' with an unresolved.  Configure should check its
>+---------------
>
>I think something's wrong on your end.  We don't have unexec on the Altos
>1000, either, and I built PL28 this morning with no problems and it passed all
>tests and is now installed.

Oh hell.  Mea culpa dudes.

I installed an unexec patch from Joe Buehler <jhpb at garage.att.com>
months ago and forgot about it.  The unexec() call isn't original
equipment, it was added by the patch.  After patching up to PL28, my
Makefile no longer had the hack to add unexec.c and so the reference
blew up.

print "Just another Perl loser,"
-- 
"We plan absentee ownership.  I'll stick to       `o'   Tom Neff
 building ships." -- George Steinbrenner, 1973    o"o   tneff at bfmny0.BFM.COM



More information about the Comp.sources.bugs mailing list