Commentary for third public review of X3J11 C

[Henry Spencer]

In article <59 at radix> jimv at radix.UUCP (Jim Valerio) writes:
>I found the responses to David Hough's comments in the last review cycle were
>often depressingly mechanical, unbalanced, and to my mind, unreasoned. ...

Little birdies tell me that the review of the second-round public comments
was, in general, awfully rushed.  It shows.
-- 
Intel CPUs are not defective,  |     Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology
they just act that way.        | uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry at zoo.toronto.edu