the "const" qualifier

[rpjday at ccu.umanitoba.ca]

In article <1990Aug2.011735.1143 at ccu.umanitoba.ca> rpjday at ccu.umanitoba.ca writes:
>OK, now that I managed to make a total fool of myself with a well-placed
>typo, let me try to prove that I am not a complete cement-head.

.
.
.

Never mind, it has been pointed out to me that the relevant section
deals with lvalues and function designators (3.2.2.1).  NOW it makes
sense.  thanks to all who mailed. 

R. Day
U of Manitoba