3.7 constraints and 3.7.2 semantics

[Doug Gwyn]

In article <5450 at mcrware.UUCP> jejones at mcrware.UUCP (James Jones) writes:
>Does p.82, lines 13-15, imply that the following is not standard conforming,
>or does p.84, lines 31-34, provide an escape hatch?

I don't understand your question -- it's not an "escape hatch",
it's an essential specification that says the declaration in
your example really is a definition.