no type-specifier ==> int

[Norman Diamond]

In article <3119 at inews.intel.com> bhoughto at hopi.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton) writes:

>Anyone see more verbose evidence that a blank
>type-specifier indicates type-specifier `int' than the two
>instances of, "or no type specifiers," at (ANSI X3.159-1989,
>sec. 3.5.2, p. 60, ll. 11 and 26)?

I don't.  But I think that line 11 (along with the text at the beginning
of the section) is sufficiently verbose for this purpose.
--
Norman Diamond       diamond at tkov50.enet.dec.com
If this were the company's opinion, I wouldn't be allowed to post it.