Must POSIX 1003.1 include files be standalone?

Arnold Robbins arnold%audiofax.com at mathcs.emory.edu
Sat May 18 02:36:33 AEST 1991


Submitted-by: arnold%audiofax.com at mathcs.emory.edu (Arnold Robbins)

In article <1991May17.011208.6853 at uunet.uu.net> decot at hpcupt1.cup.hp.com (Dave Decot) writes:
>POSIX.1-1991 will *require* that implementations provide stand-alone
>headers.  In addition, a program will need to include *at most* one header
>in order to use a particular function (the one that contains the prototype
>for the function).

Er, what is POSIX-1.1991?  Didn't we just get through getting POSIX-1.1990?
-- 
Arnold Robbins				 AudioFAX, Inc. | Threads are the
2000 Powers Ferry Road, Suite 200 / Marietta, GA. 30067 | lack of an idea.
INTERNET: arnold at audiofax.com  Phone:   +1 404 618 4281 |     -- Rob Pike
UUCP:	  emory!audfax!arnold  Fax-box: +1 404 618 4581 |

[ Another year, another standard.  -- mod ]

Volume-Number: Volume 23, Number 74



More information about the Comp.std.unix mailing list