Must POSIX 1003.1 include files be standalone?
Arnold Robbins
arnold%audiofax.com at mathcs.emory.edu
Sat May 18 02:36:33 AEST 1991
Submitted-by: arnold%audiofax.com at mathcs.emory.edu (Arnold Robbins)
In article <1991May17.011208.6853 at uunet.uu.net> decot at hpcupt1.cup.hp.com (Dave Decot) writes:
>POSIX.1-1991 will *require* that implementations provide stand-alone
>headers. In addition, a program will need to include *at most* one header
>in order to use a particular function (the one that contains the prototype
>for the function).
Er, what is POSIX-1.1991? Didn't we just get through getting POSIX-1.1990?
--
Arnold Robbins AudioFAX, Inc. | Threads are the
2000 Powers Ferry Road, Suite 200 / Marietta, GA. 30067 | lack of an idea.
INTERNET: arnold at audiofax.com Phone: +1 404 618 4281 | -- Rob Pike
UUCP: emory!audfax!arnold Fax-box: +1 404 618 4581 |
[ Another year, another standard. -- mod ]
Volume-Number: Volume 23, Number 74
More information about the Comp.std.unix
mailing list