Development Set 3.5 vs. 3.51

[Peter J. Holsberg]

In article <1730 at rtech.UUCP> rog at rtech.UUCP (Roger Taranto) writes:
|
|When I upgraded my machine from OS 3.5 to 3.51, the installation
|instructions said not to use the 3.5 Development set.  Since I wasn't
|interested in paying any more money, I kept the 3.5 Development Set.
|
|So, my questions are: what, if anything, will go wrong if I continue
|to use the 3.5 Development Set with the 3.51 OS?  Second, how much
|is the upgrade to the 3.51 DS, and how difficult is it to get.
|
|-Roger
|{mtxinu,ptsfa,amdahl,sun}!rtech!rog


Can't answer the second question, Roger, but I've been using 3.5
development set on 3.51 machines for a couple of months.  The only
problem was loading the advanced editors--several of the 3.5 AE disks
couldn't be read.

-- 
Peter Holsberg                  UUCP: {rutgers!}princeton!mccc!pjh
Technology Division             CompuServe: 70240,334
Mercer College                  GEnie: PJHOLSBERG
Trenton, NJ 08690               Voice: 1-609-586-4800