Info-3B2 Digest, Number 37

[Info-3b2 Mailer]

                           Info-3b2 Digest, Number 37
 
                           Tuesday, November 1st 1988
 
Today's Topics:
 
                         Re: Info-3b2 Digest, Number 35
                            Re: 3B News Distribution
                        Re: Benchmarks and bug in inews.c
                        Re: Benchmarks and bug in inews.c
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 88 12:33:38 -0100
From: "Joerg Kaiser" <cogsci!uunet.uu.net!unido!gmdzi!kaiser>
Subject: Re: Info-3b2 Digest, Number 35

------------------------------
 
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 88 12:17:04 GMT
Subject: Re: 3B News Distribution
From: hoptoad!quaduk!graham (Graham Glen)

> 
> I will be glad to feed as many sites that require this,
> and will call your sites directly.
> 
Do you really mean this? :-)

Graham
London, England

------------------------------
 
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 88 16:16:40 GMT
Subject: Re: Benchmarks and bug in inews.c
From: hoptoad!quaduk!graham (Graham Glen)

> 
> I will be posting the source to the dhrystone suite in
> 3b.misc soon if no one objects. 
> 
>  AT&T 3B2/310 10 mhz in full multiuser mode (init 2) : 1041.7
>  System V 3.1, Compiler 3.1
>   
>  AT&T 3B2/400 14 mhz in full multiuser mode (init 2) : 1666.7
>  System V 3.1, Compiler 3.1
> 

I would be interested to know if there any plans to re-run the tests under
the 4.2 compiler.

If not, if someone could mail the sources to me (I don't currently receive
news), then I will do it.

This is purely for my own academic interest.

Graham

------------------------------
 
From: len at netsys.COM (Len Rose)
Subject: Re: Benchmarks and bug in inews.c
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 88 20:52:39 EST

 I recompiled the dhrystone sources under C 4.2 and got exactly the same
 result. I was not able to load 4.2 on the 310.

> >  AT&T 3B2/400 14 mhz in full multiuser mode (init 2) : 1666.7
> >  System V 3.1, Compiler 3.1
> > 

 The machine was doing nothing at the time. To verify my results, I did an
 init 1 and the results were the same.

 I suppose the valid way is init 1.

> I would be interested to know if there any plans to re-run the tests under
> the 4.2 compiler.
> 
> If not, if someone could mail the sources to me (I don't currently receive
> news), then I will do it.

 I will be posting the sources to u3b.tech soon. Also, I will mail the sources
 to you, Graham. The rest of you can obtain u3b.* :-)

> This is purely for my own academic interest.

 This is purely to prove a point!

--
len at netsys.com

 
-------------------------------------
 
To join this group or have your thoughts in the next issue, please
send electronic mail to Ken Davis at the following address;
 
	{pacbell,netsys,hoptoad,well}!lamc!info-3b2-request
 
The views expressed in Info-3b2 Digest are those of the 
individual authors only.
 
*********************
End of Info-3b2 Digest
*********************