NO on comp.sys.att.3b1 (yes on comp.sys.3b1)

[Gary S. Trujillo]

In <459 at hico2.UUCP> kak at hico2.UUCP (Kris A. Kugel) writes:

> I'd like to place a STRONG objection to comp.sys.att.3b1,
> (or comp.sys.att.<anything>.)

I find Kris' arguments to be very well-stated and compelling, and
therefore would like to go on record as supporting the proposal to
make the upcoming vote be about creating new newsgroups *without*
any mention of AT&T:

	comp.sys.3b1

	comp.sources.3b1

-- 
    Gary S. Trujillo                            gst at gnosys.svle.ma.us
Somerville, Massachusetts              {wjh12,bu.edu,spdcc,ima,cdp}!gnosys!gst