Proposal on the unix-pc.* and comp.sys.att newsgroup changes
Bruce D. Becker
bdb at becker.UUCP
Sun Dec 2 13:32:05 AEST 1990
In article <75436 at iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> templon at copper.ucs.indiana.edu (jeffrey templon) writes:
|[...]
|Thus it seems to me we have a three choices:
|
|1) Take on the whole comp.sys.att reorganization NOW. Put the 3b1 somewhere
|under comp.sys.att, such as comp.sys.att.7300, comp.sys.att.unixpc,
|comp.sys.att.3b1. We then have a sources group to match in comp.sources.
|We also propose creation of comp.sys.att.3b2, comp.sys.att.63xx, etc.
|
|2) we propose to put the new group under comp.sys.att.{3b1,unixpc,7300} and
|state that we would like to make the new group compatible with any FUTURE
|reorganization, but we really are only interested in the 3b1 models. We
|say 'let the 3b2 owners get their own newsgroup passed.'
|
|3) we propose to call the group comp.sys.convergent.s4 which completely
|divorces us from at&t and explicitly include the CT people.
4) we begin to wonder what the fuss was all about, and
gradually but inexorably come to the conclusion that it
wasn't a very good idea after all.
I'm pretty sure I'm in favor of number 4.
--
,u, Bruce Becker Toronto, Ontario
a /i/ Internet: bdb at becker.UUCP, bruce at gpu.utcs.toronto.edu
`\o\-e UUCP: ...!uunet!mnetor!becker!bdb
_< /_ "I still have my phil-os-o-phy" - Meredith Monk
More information about the Comp.sys.att
mailing list