comp.sys.3b1? (was Re: Monthly posting about Unix-PC networ

David Kozinn david at dbk.uucp
Sat Nov 17 01:15:04 AEST 1990


In article <35955 at cup.portal.com> thad at cup.portal.com (Thad P Floryan) writes:
>
>Either *.3b1.* or *.7300.* or even *.pc7300.* would be reasonable alternatives.
>Beginning with a digit means the group also appears at the head of the list!

>From reading these postings, it seems to me that most of us are in
agreement that using 3b1 instead of unix-pc is A Good Thing. Has there been
any great outcry of disagreement? I haven't seen any. Do we need to keep
beating this part of the discussion endlessly?
-- 
David Kozinn                     
UUCP:   uunet!vmp!dbk!david
Domain: david at dbk.vmp.com
GEnie:  D.KOZINN 



More information about the Comp.sys.att mailing list