SPARCServer-1 performance
Jeffrey C Honig
jch at risci.tn.cornell.edu
Thu May 31 17:04:40 AEST 1990
Does anyone have a feel for the performance of the SPARCServer-1 in
relation to Sun's older fileservers, namely a Sun 3/260? We have a Sun
3/260S with 16MBytes and a SMD-4 controller and two 2351 Eagles. The
client load is three 4MByte diskless 3/50's running X windows, a dataless
SS1+ and a few other hosts mounting file systems.
Because of the poor performance of the 3/50s I was planning to turn them
into X terminals with the work being done by the server (as soon as
FrameMaker 2.1X is available).
Is a SPARCServer-1 a reasonable replacement for a 3/260? If not, where is
the bottleneck? Ethernet throughput, SCSI throughput, disk throughput?
Thanks.
Jeff
More information about the Comp.sys.sun
mailing list