E-mail Privacy
Tim Chown
tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Wed Jun 12 08:24:59 AEST 1991
In <3651 at happym.WA.COM> josh at happym.WA.COM (Joshua_Putnam) writes:
>Absent an ironclad guarantee of privacy, I have no right to assume any
>files on the company's computer are absolutely inviolable. If regular
>backups are made and kept, I have no reason to believe they will not
>be used. Even if the company provides nominally private personal
>directories to employees, employees should remember that their files
>may be viewed accidentally by administrators (who should keep quiet
>about what they see in such cases).
Sometimes the mail system, sendmail in our case, fails due to an
error of some sort. It's quite rare but as our postmaster I
redirect failed headers to me so I can attempt to prevent
similar failures and notify senders/intended recipients
of the problem and perhaps the cause.
Anyway, as a result I saw a message between two students that
was clearly showing them to be cheating in an assigment by exchanging
pieces of code. I only saw the subject line, but it was enough.
Do you turn a blind eye? Do you let the offenders gain an unfair
advantage? It's not at all clear cut. We have correlation software
written as the basis as a PhD that checks for collaboration on the
structure of code, but when you have the extra "proof" should you
root (literally ;-) around further? Tricky.
Tim
--
More information about the Comp.unix.admin
mailing list