RS6000 questions/comments
Sean Eric Fagan
sef at kithrup.COM
Sat Jun 29 17:34:05 AEST 1991
In article <678126129.18432 at mindcraft.com> karish at mindcraft.com (Chuck Karish) writes:
>> I almost tried a -D__STDC__=0 on the compile line, but chickened
>> out, maybe I'll try that some other time.
>If the code you're porting assigns a special meaning to the
>case where __STDC__ == 0, it's broken and should be fixed. Not
>an AIX problem. The #define would probably have worked. Any
>problems caused by doing this should be reported to IBM as
>bugs; their tests for __STDC__ in headers should be correct.
Chuck, I'm disappointed. __* is reserved for the implementation; if you
define it at all, anything is allowed to happen. (See one of Henry
Spencer's or Chris Torek's descriptions of what "anything" could mean.)
--
Sean Eric Fagan | "What *does* that 33 do? I have no idea."
sef at kithrup.COM | -- Chris Torek
-----------------+ (torek at ee.lbl.gov)
Any opinions expressed are my own, and generally unpopular with others.
More information about the Comp.unix.aix
mailing list