Microsoft Word & (SCO) Unix 3.2
Peter da Silva
peter at ficc.uu.net
Thu Sep 7 02:23:27 AEST 1989
In article <14629 at bfmny0.UUCP>, tneff at bfmny0.UUCP (Tom Neff) writes:
> In article <6031 at ficc.uu.net> peter at ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:
> >[The UNXUDI slick]
> > also has the annoying problem of translating file names into and out of
> >the DOS world (yes, I know it's not really DOS... it hooks into the UDI in
> >the DOS tools at a higher level).
> Note that everything having to do with DOS, *including* the stuff in the
> EXE header, is completely out of the picture.
OK, then the problem is moving stuff into and out of the UDI world. Which
is based on RMX/ISIS. Since ISIS begat CP/M which begat MS-DOS it's pretty
much a toss up which silly little acronyms you use.
> This IS darn difficult, and under-documented in the manual. Generally
> you have to UPPERCASE the keywords and lowercase the filenames, but some
> things seem cantankerous.
Not to mention giving you severe indigestion when you try to retain some
sort of compatibility between your Xenix-286 based scripts and your System
V based scripts. :-<
> [intel brainwashed] into believing that OS/2 was somehow the answer to
> something [?!], and [...] the systems people sneered at Unix.
Peter da Silva, *NIX support guy @ Ferranti International Controls Corporation.
Biz: peter at ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5180. Fun: peter at sugar.hackercorp.com. `-_-'
"The Distribution: field on the header has been modified so as not to 'U`
violate Information Export laws." -- eugene miya, NASA Ames Research Center.
More information about the Comp.unix.i386