Are UW? (was Re: A general Thanks)
David Arasmith
arasmith at mathcs.emory.edu
Tue Jan 2 17:06:15 AEST 1990
In article <-NXN9ficc at ficc.uu.net> peter at ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) responds
to my question:
>> I never saw any response about uw for the 386. Any ideas on where I
>> should ask?
>
>In alphabetical order:
> comp.sys.amiga
> comp.sys.atari.st
> comp.sys.mac
>
>Problem is that uw is heavy in sockets, and there's no standard pty on
>System V that works like the BSD one. And people into System V tend to
>want 386 clones at home, too.
>
Perhaps the uw server is heavy on sockets, but I know that does not have
to be the case with the client. My reasoning: I am using uw even as I type
from my Unixpc (stock sys V r2.something). This version was written by
a friendly unixpc hacker at caltech, but it relies heavily on the Unixpc's
resident window manager. I was also doing some work on a client for the above
machine; Andy just got it done first.
Bottom line: I know it can be done with just sysV ipc. I just don't have
the time, nor the knowledge (yet) of 386 architecture to hack one myself
presently. It would really be groovy if someone has already done this work!
>The other problem with uw is that it's a logical subset of PPP, and people
>are waiting for Godot.
>
>If anyone has it, I want it too.
What's PPP, or, for that matter, Godot? Are these other methods of
multiplexing a serial line? (Is this the dumbest question of the new year?)
--
David M. Arasmith | arasmith at mathcs.emory.edu Internet
Emory University | {sun!sunatl,gatech}!emory!arasmith UUCP
Dept of Math and CS |
Atlanta, GA 30322 | I should be working! Gee....I wonder what's on TV?
More information about the Comp.unix.i386
mailing list