"PANIC: kernel mode trap. Type 0x0000000E" msg in 386/ix 2.0.2 ?????

[David William Vrona]

In article <45326 at ism780c.isc.com> darryl at ism780c.UUCP (Darryl Richman) writes:
>In article <9480 at bunny.GTE.COM> jdg0 at GTE.COM (Jose Diaz-Gonzalez) writes:
>"My machine has been crashing about twice daily for the last week or so.
>"The msg in the subject line shows up with all the register contents just
>"before it crashes.  I have contacted my vendor, they contacted ISC, and
>"all they were able to tell me was that it the problem is a hardware
>"error.  Now, I've run my diagnostics (I'm using an AT&T 6386E/33) and
>"everything appears to be OK.  Does anyone have any idea of what a type
>"0x0000000E error means?  This might help me to narrow down the
>"alternatives.   Any pointers will be appreciated.  Thanks,
>
>You can do a bit of tracing yorself to see what is going on.  A trap E
>is a page fault--which usually means that there is a bad pointer being
>followed in the kernel.  You can discover what routine within the kernel
>is causing the problem by noting the EIP value in the register dump,
>and after rebooting, do "nm -vexp /unix | sort >/tmp/foo".  Then edit
>/tmp/foo and look for the first 5 digits or so of the EIP value...the
>greatest address less than or equal to your EIP value is the routine
>that was executing.
>
>An even easier way to do this is to configure your kernel
>with the kernel debugger.  When the panic occurs, you will drop into the
>debugger.  Type "stack" to see a stack backtrace.  You will also see the
>instruction that caused the fault.  This will give you much more information
>with which to use to get an answer out of your reseller, and ultimately,
>ISC.
>
>A "hardware error" means nothing.  Either your vendor misunderstood the
>reply or hasn't pushed very hard on your behalf.  Unix tends to be a
>much harder test of the hardware than the vendor's diagnostics;  we had
>a case where a certain vendor was shipping cards that worked fine under
>DOS and passed all of their tests just fine, but would never send an
>interrupt;  needless to say, Unix found this out quickly.  When discussing
>a problem like this, it is extremely important to pass along as much
>information about your configuration as possible--all of the boards,
>their interrupt and DMA numbers, how much memory, the make, model, and
>geometry of the disks (if they are involved), whose motherboard, any
>coprocessors, and so on.  All of these things tend to interact.

It's a hardware problem.  Exact same thing happened to me.  Took me two 
months to realize it was a noisy (electrically that is) power supply.
Borrow a supply from a friend before you knock yourself out with all the
other stuff.