ESDI caching disk controllers: Reprise
Dr. Scump
aland at infmx.UUCP
Sat May 5 14:29:32 AEST 1990
In article <1736 at serene.UUCP> rfarris at serene.UU.NET (Rick Farris) writes:
>In article <1424 at ssbn.WLK.COM> bill at ssbn.WLK.COM (Bill Kennedy) writes:
>
>> With a 768K cache memory on one card I routinely get 32% cache hits
>> and with 4Mb on the one in ssbn I get 48-52% cache hits.
>
>That brings up an interesting point. I think I remember learning
>that without a cache-hit rate of 90% or better, you're generally
>better off without a cache, due to the overhead involved in cache
>misses.
>
>Yet Bill tells us that subjectively the machine seems faster. Is
>this a special case? Is the 90% number only effective with the much
>smaller differential in access speed between cache and core? Does
>the larger spread between core and disk mean that a lower hit rate is
>effective? ...
That surprises me, but I'm no expert. Keep in mind, however, that
some controllers do other things besides simple caching: readahead,
sorted writeback, DMA, adjustable bus speeds, etc. The caching
controllers I'm using (Consensys PowerStor) make the machines
*scream*, even when simple cache hit percentages aren't that high.
>Rick Farris RF Engineering POB M Del Mar, CA 92014 voice (619) 259-6793
--
Alan Denney @ Informix Software, Inc. "We're homeward bound
aland at informix.com {pyramid|uunet}!infmx!aland ('tis a damn fine sound!)
----------------------------------------------- with a good ship, taut & free
Disclaimer: These opinions are mine alone. We don't give a damn,
If I am caught or killed, the secretary when we drink our rum
will disavow any knowledge of my actions. with the girls of old Maui."
More information about the Comp.unix.i386
mailing list