comp.unix[.i386].apps (Re: Come on, stop blaming/flaming SCO!)

[Peter da Silva]

In article <2237 at crdos1.crd.ge.COM> davidsen at crdos1.crd.ge.com (bill davidsen) writes:
> There are some very good arguments for comp.unix.i386.apps...

Another good group, should this be done as well as, or in spite of
comp.unix.apps? I can think of good arguments either way. most of them
come down to the relative availability of V/386 apps and non-V/386 apps
(presumably including Xenix apps, as well as any BSD ones). Since I'm
not familiar with the majority of the UNIX applications market, I'll let
someone else do the analysis...
-- 
`-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180.      <peter at ficc.uu.net>
 'U`  Have you hugged your wolf today?  <peter at sugar.hackercorp.com>
@FIN  Commercial solicitation *is* accepted by email to this address.