SVID (was: Submission for comp-unix-microport)

[Ken Seefried III]

>Reply-To: debra at alice.UUCP ()
>Organization: AT&T, Bell Labs
>
>Thank God no! It is still SCO Xenix, but it has been somewhat extended
>to be able to run 386-Unix binaries. It is supposed to become more SVID
>compliant too I believe.
>

Point of clarification:  please correct me if I am wrong, but my
understanding of SVID is that you are either SVID compliant or you are
not.  Being 'more compliant' is like being 'more pregnant'.

Is this not correct?

   ...ken