Programmable idling...

Doug Gwyn gwyn at smoke.BRL.MIL
Sat Nov 11 06:45:36 AEST 1989


In article <6899 at ficc.uu.net> peter at ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:
>Um, what's wrong with !pause()!?

Nothing, but often read() or accept() would be better since if it
does return (non-EINTR) the daemon can proceed to do useful work
without needing to be prodded by an interrupt.



More information about the Comp.unix.questions mailing list