System V.4

[Michael Almond]

In article <112 at raysnec.UUCP> shwake at raysnec.UUCP (Ray Shwake) writes:
>mra at srchtec.uucp (Michael Almond) writes:
>
>>I compiled the X stuff directly from MIT on DECstation 2100's without any
>>problem (DECwindows su*ks).  I've also heard people have the X11R4 running
>>on PCs under Esix using the MIT stuff.
>
>	There's a big difference between having something compile and run,
>and having it run well.

I'm not sure what constitutes running well, but the X11R4 code from MIT runs
faster than DECwindows code (which I would guess is suppose to be a version of
MIT's that runs well [what a joke]).

What are these vendors adding to the code to make it run well?

I plan to add XView later this year/early next year when SUN releases the code
for the DEC's. BTW, they will also have the code ready for IBM PC's (YES!!).


---
Michael R. Almond                                  mra at srchtec.uucp (registered)
search technology, inc.				        emory!stiatl!srchtec!mra
Atlanta, Georgia                                         (404) 441-1457 (office)
.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. Georgia Tech Alumnus .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.