SVR4.0

[Amrit Bains]

In article <1991Apr6.184400.47303 at cc.usu.edu> jrd at cc.usu.edu writes:
>In article <9104051959.AA23768 at ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>, DA462CS at OPIE.BGSU.EDU writes:
>> ... deleted...
>> the different vendors.  At this time I can get AT&T SVR4.0 at a good
>> price, this is my choice right now.  Is there any benefit in going with
>> the other guys: Interactive, SCO, ESIX, UHC????  Price is not a concern 
>> because personally I don't think the AT&T stuff is that expensive... I
>> don't want to start any religious wars here, just some helpfull comments
>> please...
>> 
>> 			Thanks in advance...
>> 			Michael L. Gantz
>> 			DA462CS at opie.bgsu.edu
>---------------
>Michael,
>	Two pieces of free advice:
>	1. determine the state of device driver support for each Unix.
>	2. determine whether your machine will even boot that Unix. For
>example, most AMI Bios machines I've checked will not boot AT&T's SVR4,
>but a Phoenix Bios is just fine.
>	Joe D. (I have an AT&T SVR4 systems a'building)


I have an 386/25 System with an AMI BIOS I have successfully run both
AT&T SVR4.0 Ver 2.0 & AT&T SVR4.0 Ver 3.0.  We have several SVR4's running in
the building.

Amrit Bains
USL
abains at attunix.att.com