Summary: What's wrong with SCO (long)
Ronald S H Khoo
ronald at robobar.co.uk
Fri Apr 19 22:47:11 AEST 1991
sef at kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan) writes:
> It can. Try looking at SLS's; the information was posted here.
And no other vendor makes their fixes so readily available.
FTP, UUCP, pick your transport. Even a local London number too :-)
> The csh is *old*. And, yeah, it's broken. I've ported tcsh, as have
> others. No real problem. Tell people at SCO you want it, and, if they get
> enough requests, they will make it available.
But can you imagine the customer telling the front line folks "Well,
yeah, one of your ex-employees says he ported it ... " :-)
> >The startup file problem ("xxx:
> >cannot execute") is ridiculous,
> Never seen that.
xxx is setgid and luid wasn't set. SecureWare strikes. No need to
rehash the old stories about that one, surely? :-)
[ ObFix: su root -c xxx instead of naked xxx. ]
--
Ronald Khoo <ronald at robobar.co.uk> +44 81 991 1142 (O) +44 71 229 7741 (H)
More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386
mailing list