radisk block number reporting
Brian V. Smith
envbvs at epb2.lbl.gov
Wed Jan 3 09:28:13 AEST 1990
Often when doing an radisk to search for bad blocks, the bad block number
reported by the -s (scan) option is off by one (1) from the block number
that the -c (clear error bit) option wants.
In other words, if the scan reports that block 2345 (e.g.) is bad, I have
to say "radisk -c 2344 1 /dev/rrd0c" to clear the error bit in the
replacement block.
Why the difference?
Disk: RD53 or RD54 (doesn't seem to matter)
machine: Vaxstation 2000 or Vaxstation II
controller: RQDX2 (vaxstation II)
Os: Ultrix 3.0
_____________________________________
Brian V. Smith (bvsmith at lbl.gov)
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
I don't speak for LBL, these non-opinions are all mine.
More information about the Comp.unix.ultrix
mailing list