Recovery possible from signal aborted write(2) ?

[Guy Harris]

> By the way, is there any reason to not have u directly readable?
> It's been that way for about two years here at cithep, but I think
> only two or three people know it!

The source to the System III "make" has a reference to a "getu" system
call from Columbus UNIX, which looks like it was intended to permit a
process to read its own U area; anybody from BTL Columbus have any
comments?

	Guy Harris
	{seismo,ihnp4,allegra}!rlgvax!guy