vhangup
The Beach Bum
jfh at rpp386.Dallas.TX.US
Mon Dec 5 07:11:00 AEST 1988
In article <5197 at mit-vax.LCS.MIT.EDU> keith at expo.lcs.mit.edu (Keith Packard) writes:
>Admittedly, the vhangup code in 4.3 is terrible. But, it can be made very
>useful. The current code turns off read/write bits in the file table. A
>big mistake, as the file remains "open", which causes the carrier to remain
>up and other problems.
Why can't the file just be closed? Why wasn't this done? How come I wasn't
consulted ;-) ?
--
John F. Haugh II +-Cat of the Week:--------------_ /|-
VoiceNet: (214) 250-3311 Data: -6272 |Aren't you absolutely sick and \'o.O'
InterNet: jfh at rpp386.Dallas.TX.US |tired of looking at these damn =(___)=
UucpNet : <backbone>!killer!rpp386!jfh +things in everybody's .sig?-------U---
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list