stdio EOF

[Chris Torek]

In article <8422 at smoke.ARPA> gwyn at smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) writes:
>... In fact [stdio] EOF should not be "sticky"; if more data becomes
>available, as on a terminal, it should be available for subsequent
>reading.  The 4.2BSD implementation broke this but it might be okay
>on 4.3BSD.

I thought this behaviour was added to 4.2BSD to conform to some
existing standard.

What does the dpANS say?  POSIX?
-- 
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 7163)
Domain:	chris at mimsy.umd.edu	Path:	uunet!mimsy!chris