BSD file system

Robert Krawitz rlk at think.com
Sun Oct 22 04:29:19 AEST 1989


In article <31003 at news.Think.COM>, dm at odin (Dave Mankins) writes:

]Symbolic links are just like hard links only with the ability to span
]filesystems (and, sadly, without the ability to know that, when you remove
]one name for a file (the target of the symbolic link) there is another name
]left dangling without a reference).

I find it more convenient to think of a symlink as nothing more than a
pointer to a named point in the filesystem.  A hard link (remember, each
file is really a link) is a pointer to an inode (a filesystem object),
whereas a symlink is a pointer to a name.
-- 
ames >>>>>>>>>  |	Robert Krawitz <rlk at think.com>	245 First St.
bloom-beacon >  |think!rlk	(postmaster)		Cambridge, MA  02142
harvard >>>>>>  .	Thinking Machines Corp.		(617)876-1111



More information about the Comp.unix.wizards mailing list