BSD file system
Robert Krawitz
rlk at think.com
Sun Oct 22 04:29:19 AEST 1989
In article <31003 at news.Think.COM>, dm at odin (Dave Mankins) writes:
]Symbolic links are just like hard links only with the ability to span
]filesystems (and, sadly, without the ability to know that, when you remove
]one name for a file (the target of the symbolic link) there is another name
]left dangling without a reference).
I find it more convenient to think of a symlink as nothing more than a
pointer to a named point in the filesystem. A hard link (remember, each
file is really a link) is a pointer to an inode (a filesystem object),
whereas a symlink is a pointer to a name.
--
ames >>>>>>>>> | Robert Krawitz <rlk at think.com> 245 First St.
bloom-beacon > |think!rlk (postmaster) Cambridge, MA 02142
harvard >>>>>> . Thinking Machines Corp. (617)876-1111
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list