wp2latex (1 of 4)

[Peter da Silva]

In article <19623 at well.sf.ca.us> Jef Poskanzer <jef at well.sf.ca.us> writes:
> You posted a list of things you thought should go in the FAQ list.  One
> of them was not impartial.

For our viewers who have tuned into this fun-filled exchange late, I believe
that all source postings should have an archive-name header, just like in the
moderated groups. A fair number already do.

I included a reference to this in my list of proposed topics in an alt.sources
FAQ posting. I also solicited feedback... if it's a taboo subject, I'll be
happy to drop it. So far, though, only one person has complained.

> However, responses of the form "if you won't do it then shut up" are
> obnoxious and boring.  I have made a valid objection.  Answer it, or
> shut up.

You deleted the portion of my message where I supported this particular
item. Might I assume, then, that your response is just more rhetoric? It's
pretty poor form to complain about my not performing a certain action in
response to a message in which I did that very thing.

In addition, where are all these other eager volunteers you were talking about?
-- 
Peter da Silva.   `-_-'
<peter at sugar.hackercorp.com>.