the "const" qualifier

[Doug Gwyn]

In article <127 at thor.UUCP> scjones at thor.UUCP (Larry Jones) writes:
>In article <13475 at smoke.BRL.MIL>, gwyn at smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn) writes:
>It seems to me that there used to be a statement in the standard that
>said basically that if an aggregate is qualified, all of the members
>are effectively qualified, and if a member of an aggregate is
>qualified, then the aggregate is effectively qualified.  Now I don't
>seem to be able to find it.  Am I imagining things again, did I miss
>it, or did we remove it?

Yeah, I was looking for that too, and I didn't find it either.
The only thing I found that was at all relevant said that a qualifier
in an array declaration actually qualifies the elements of the array,
not the array itself.  However, that's not what we're looking for..
I have no idea what might have happened to the part<->whole clause.