Proposal on the unix-pc.* and comp.sys.att newsgroup changes

[Donald Lashomb]

In article <57804 at becker.UUCP> bdb at becker.UUCP (Bruce D. Becker) writes:
>
>4) we begin to wonder what the fuss was all about, and
>gradually but inexorably come to the conclusion that it
>wasn't a very good idea after all.
>
>
>I'm pretty sure I'm in favor of number 4.

Me too, let's leave well enough alone.
The old saw "if it ain't broke don't fix it" might apply here.

Don		donlash at uncle.UUCP