NFS mounting from Macs

Dave Wells dwells at Apple.COM
Tue May 23 16:28:35 AEST 1989


In article <415 at wizard.UUCP> john at wizard.UUCP (John Danner) writes:
>Can someone explain to me why a Mac using the same hard drive as a Sun386i
>might be significantly slower as an NFS server?  There seems to be a 
>significantly longer amount of time needed to transfer large files or to
>save a large file under emacs, etc.  I have heard something like A/UX's
...

The method used to prepare the disk for A/UX use is very important to
the performance of any drive.  I take it you've already tried and experienced
poor performance?  The most common pitfall in preparing HDs for A/UX use
has to be the mkfs command.  What options did you specify? 
Be _very_ careful with the gap parameter  It defaults to 7 and can kill
disk performance. 

-Dave

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
           Dave Wells, Apple Computer, Inc.  MS: 37-O  (408) 974-5515
          Mail: dwells at apple.com or AppleLink d.wells or GEnie D.WELLS
 These opinions may be nothing more than the ramblings of a fatigued tinkerer
                         -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 There's one big difference between genius and stupidity.  Genius has limits.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



More information about the Comp.unix.aux mailing list