new groups for iX86 unix (was: Bell Tech 386 SysVr3)

[Steve Dyer]

In article <1988Aug16.011817.17102 at gpu.utcs.toronto.edu> woods at gpu.utcs.Toronto.EDU (Greg Woods) writes:
]In article <728 at wb3ffv.UUCP> howardl at wb3ffv.UUCP (Howard Leadmon ) writes:
]....
]>comp.unix.i286			General 80286 UNIX discussions
]>comp.unix.i386			General 80386 UNIX discussions
]>comp.unix.i286.microport	For System V/AT
]>comp.unix.i386.microport	For System V/386
]>comp.unix.i386.ix		For IX from Interactive for the 80386
]>comp.unix.i286.xenix		For 80286 Xenix
]>comp.unix.1386.xenix		For 80386 Xenix 
]
]YES!  PLEASE!  Then I could rave at only the right people!  :-)
]
]Seriously, we must do something about this, and this is the best I've seen.

This is known as news.groups.anal.retentive.  Such a specialization would
never work.  You think the x-posting is bad between the xenix and microport
groups now??

Comp.unix.intel, puleease.
-- 
Steve Dyer
dyer at harvard.harvard.edu
dyer at spdcc.COM aka {harvard,husc6,linus,ima,bbn,m2c,mipseast}!spdcc!dyer