WRONG!
Steven P. Donegan
donegan at stanton.TCC.COM
Sat Jun 4 23:33:45 AEST 1988
In article <837 at .UUCP>, peter at ficc.UUCP (Peter da Silva) writes:
>
> > > 3) The message base, file handling, and bulletins (motd and others)
> > > use non-standard layouts and fixed length record formats.
>
> > They are MY format; therefore they are standard for xbbs!
>
> Fixed length record files are very rarely appropriate for a UNIX system.
> Certainly a low-performance application like a BBS doesn't need them.
> The downside obvious: you can't use an editor on them...
> --
> -- Peter da Silva, Ferranti International Controls Corporation.
> -- Phone: 713-274-5180. Remote UUCP: uunet!nuchat!sugar!peter.
Gosh Peter (FLAMES ON), I have been using vi on my XBBS bulletins, control
files and motd's for ages. You tell me that it's obvious that I can't do
what I've been doing for about 2 years?
I am getting rather sick of the totally unfounded and obviously uninformed
comments of quite a few different individuals on Sandy's XBBS system. Most
downside comments I've seen here so far prove that the individuals making
the comments have never actually installed/operated/managed an XBBS system.
I also take exception to the 'low-performance application' comment. XBBS is
a very efficient, fast, responsive system that hides system load well. Users
of the XBBS system note very little response degradation on a heavily loaded
system, much less than a shell user on the same system.
Come on folks, before flaming someones efforts to provide FREE software of
any variety at least:
Try it before bitching.
Bitch constructively.
Make sure of your FACTS.
--
Steven P. Donegan
Sr. Telecommunications Analyst
Western Digital Corp.
donegan at stanton.TCC.COM
More information about the Comp.unix.xenix
mailing list