Question about function pointers & prototypes
Doug Gwyn
gwyn at smoke.BRL.MIL
Mon Aug 28 14:56:35 AEST 1989
In article <19278 at mimsy.UUCP> chris at mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek) writes:
>The proposed standard seems (meaning `you should check this yourself')
>to require that all function pointers `fit' in some other function pointer
>storage cell.
I don't recall any constraints that would imply this. Pointers to
functions are far less "flexible" than object pointers.
More information about the Comp.std.c
mailing list