Why no comp.sys.ibm.r6000?

[Brian Kelley]

In article <1991Apr17.035222.18286 at midway.uchicago.edu> rtp1 at quads.uchicago.edu (raymond thomas pierrehumbert) writes:
>
>I notice that this group (now that I've finally found it!) basically
>serves the function of "comp.sys.r6000".  So why is it stuck under
>unix?  We have comp.sys.hp, not comp.unix.HPUX, and comp.sys.apollo,
>not comp.unix.DOMAIN.  What's the history here?  
>    Is anybody interested in establishing comp.sys.ibm.r6000 and
>moving there?  

No.  comp.unix.aix works for me.  This group also covers the RT.

---
brian at cimage.com