New group comp.unix.sco

[Superuser]

In article <15292 at bfmny0.UU.NET> tneff at bfmny0.UU.NET (Tom Neff) writes:
->Dick Dunn is exactly right, regardless of his employer.  We do not need
->a separate SCO products newsgroup.  There are a number of classic
->reasons for collecting articles in a newsgroup, but "because XYZ is the
->vendor" is not a good one.  If SCO wants to start a support mailing list
->they can and should.  In the meantime, topics should be grouped by
->functionality, not nameplate.  Yes, crossposting is sometimes necessary
->and appropriate.  That's what it was invented for!  It happens all the
->time with all kinds of vendors' products.  SCO is nothing special.
->
->Keep in mind that Interactive sells other things too, as do many other
->vendors.  If comp.unix.interactive were proposed, I would vote against
->that too, and I would expect to see Dick Dunn's vote next to my own.
->(Unless the vote counter did an alpha sort :-) )
->
->-- 
->Psychoanalysis is the mental illness   \\\    Tom Neff
->it purports to cure. -- Karl Kraus      \\\   tneff at bfmn0.UU.NET


-- 
 ///   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > 
 0 0   Richard Ducoty                               ..uunet!grumbly!root
  >    Capitola, Calif                                root at grumbly.com
 `