Summary: What's wrong with SCO (long)

[Peter da Silva]

In article <1991Apr16.183342.10185 at compu.com> fred at compu.com (Fred Rump) writes:
> dvb at emisle.uucp (David Van Beveren) writes:
> >The one-line summary is this: People who have SCO Unix are satisfied with it.

>         Reading the various responses I get a different message back.
>         It seems that satisfied is a bit of an understatement.

Reading the responses, I get a different message back. It seems that SCO is
as buggy as all hell, but if you never do anything but run canned stuff
you never excersize the bugs.
-- 
Peter da Silva.  `-_-'  peter at ferranti.com
+1 713 274 5180.  'U`  "Have you hugged your wolf today?"